|
|||||
| Full
extract taken from the Thornbury Gazette, dated 28th January 2010. Owners of Eastwood Park say they will have to sell some of its land to fund the estate’s future. Management at the 200 acres estate have revealed plans for a multi-million pound redevelopment of the site, including a new conference centre with accommodation and state-of-the-art medical training facilities. However, bosses at the popular wedding venue say some of the estate will have to be sold to pay for the upgrade. John Thatcher, chief executive at Eastwood Park, said: “We have to do this. “We cannot carry on much longer doing this high-tech work in this environment. “At the moment we are using facilities that were made for other purposes. “We have garages and building that have been turned into laboratories and workshops. “If we can’t upgrade here we would have to look to move to another site. “This is going to cost a significant sum of money, which we cannot, resource. We are going to have to raise the money through enabling developments.” Two areas identified
for sale are an old military campsite to the back of the estate behind
the Eastwood Park nursery and a corner of land south of Falfield village
near the A38. In the past 40 years
it has provided specialist technical healthcare and engineering management
training, as well as hosting weddings and conferences. We also want to restore some of the former glory of the estate. We need to demolish some of the older temporary buildings that were put up some 50 years ago.” Mike Pirie, chairman of Falfield Parish Council, said: “The proposals have been received very well by the community.” Below are comments and questions made by members of the public present at the Parish Council meeting on Tuesday 19th January 2010 when the above was presented to the Parish Council and members of the general public. Concern of drainage and flooding issues. Size of proposed housing development close to the A38 ~ Answer was given that it could be approx one hectare consisting of approx 30 properties. Lack of access through the estate due to the lack of a public footpath Concern was raised that once any building was established on the proposed site close to the A38 that this would then allow further the potential of further development in subsequent years. It was felt that there would
only be two options open for access any development from either the A38
or Church Avenue. It was pointed out that Church Avenue was not an adopted
road and that access from Church Avenue into Sundayshill Lane was already
considered by many people to be unsafe. |
|
||||